Resources

{ Banner Image } Print PDF
Share
Subscribe to Publications

Can An Instant Message Exchange Amend The Terms of Your Contract?

April 12, 2011

Instant messaging is often used for quick, informal communications.  When used in a business setting, could an instant message exchange become an amendment to a written agreement between the parties?  Based on a recent federal court decision, the answer is a resounding "yes."

In August, 2009, Smoking Everywhere Inc., a seller of electronic cigarettes, entered into a written contract with affiliate advertising company CX Digital Media Inc.  Under the contract, CX Digital referred Smoking Everywhere to web sites that posted ads for Smoking Everywhere's products and Smoking Everywhere agreed to pay CX Digital $45.00 for each completed sale up to 200 sales per day.  About a month after signing the contract, Smoking Everywhere's vice president of advertising and an account manager of CX Digital spent most of a day communicating about the advertising links via instant message.  At one point, the CX Digital account manager messaged:  "We can do 2000 orders/day by Friday if I have your blessing."  Thereafter, the Smoking Everywhere VP responded:  "NO LIMIT" to which CX Digital's representative replied: "awesome!"  After that, the number of sales CX Digital sent to Smoking Everywhere increased substantially to an average of 1244 sales per day.  A dispute arose when Smoking Everywhere didn't pay CX Digital's invoices.

CX Digital filed a breach of contract action against Smoking Everywhere in federal court in Florida.  Applying Delaware law, the court rejected Smoking Everywhere's asserted defense that the instant message exchange could not amend the parties' contract, including the argument that the contract required that amendments be agreed to by the parties in writing.  The court ruled that "the instant messages operate collectively as an unsigned writing containing the terms of the agreement to modify" the contract.  After a five day trial, the court awarded damages to CX Digital of over $1.2 million dollars based on the amended contract terms.

If your organization uses instant messaging to communicate with business partners, take care that you are not agreeing to terms inconsistent with your contractual terms that could result in an amendment to the terms of your contractual engagements. 

For more information about legislation or litigation involving technology, intellectual property protection of information technology assets or any other Information Technology law issue, contact your Miller Canfield attorney.




 

Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek