Resources

{ Banner Image } Print PDF
Share
Subscribe to Publications

Supreme Court Limits an Employer's Duty to Third Parties

July 16, 2007

In Brown v. Samuel-Whittar Steel, Inc., the Michigan Supreme Court reversed an earlier Michigan Court of Appeals decision which potentially set broad standards for an employer's liability when one of its employees sexually assaults a third party.

As we reported in our May 2006 Client Alert, the Court of Appeals concluded that Samuel-Whittar Steel could be responsible for the injuries to a female security guard who was sexually assaulted by one of its employees. While the employee did not have a criminal record, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision to dismiss the security guard's negligence claim, finding that because the Company had knowledge that its employee made vulgar, harassing comments to the security guard, it may have been negligent in failing to prevent the assault.

Reversing the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court concluded that "where an employee has no prior criminal record or history of violent behavior indicating a propensity to rape, an employer is not liable solely on the basis of the employee's lewd comments for a rape perpetrated by that employee if those comments failed to convey an unmistakable, particularized threat of rape." According to the Supreme Court, the Company's knowledge of the tasteless comments was insufficient to put it on notice of "an imminent risk of harm to a specific victim." In other words, the Company could not have reasonably anticipated that the employee would perpetrate the assault. The Court, however, expressly acknowledged that in certain circumstances, an employee's words can create a duty owed by an employer to a third party.

Brown's lesson is clear. In addition to an employer's statutory obligation to take prompt remedial action in response to known sexual harassment towards its employees, an employer that learns that one of its employees threatened to assault a third party has a duty to take reasonable responsive measures. Failure to do so could expose an employer to liability for negligence if the employee subsequently injures the third party.


For further information, contact Miller Canfield's Labor and Employment Group; Adam S. Forman at (313) 496-7654, or Brian Schwartz at (313) 496-7551.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek