Resources

{ Banner Image } Print PDF
Share
Subscribe to Publications

People

Services

District Court Invalidates DOL's White Collar Regulations

September 6, 2017

The higher salary requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) white collar exemptions that were set to take effect December 1, 2016, have been ruled invalid by a U.S. District Court in Texas. The same court preliminarily enjoined the implementation of these regulations on November 22, 2016. That decision is presently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Although the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) requested that the district court delay its final decision on the merits of the case until after the court of appeals rules on the preliminary injunction, the district court declined to do so and issued its final decision on August 31, 2017.

In rejecting the DOL’s increased salary levels, the district court concluded that Congress defined the white collar exemptions (executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employee) with regard to duties without reference to a salary component. Thus, the district court held that the DOL does not have the authority to use a salary-level test that effectively eliminates the congressionally-mandated duties test in deciding who is exempt from overtime under the FLSA. As such, the district court concluded that the DOL had failed to carry out Congress’ intent and the new regulations were unlawful because the DOL’s new salary level would exclude many employees who were, in fact, performing exempt duties based solely on a salary basis which was not reasonably tied to inflation.

On September 5, the DOL announced it was withdrawing its appeal of the district court’s preliminary injunction and left unclear as to whether the DOL will appeal this final district court decision. However, the DOL recently issued a Request for Information from employers and other interested groups regarding further revisions to the FLSA white collar regulations. This signals that the DOL is likely considering proposing new white collar regulations, instead of adopting the previously issued regulations rejected by the district court. Those regulations would not become effective without the required notice and comment period, pushing any new salary requirement well-into 2018 or beyond.

We will continue to update you regarding this issue. If you have any questions related to this or any other employment law matter, please contact your Miller Canfield attorneys.

Brian Schwartz
Brian Schwartz
+1.313.496.7551
schwartzs@millercanfield.com




Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek