Resources

{ Banner Image } Print PDF
Share
Subscribe to Publications

Services

Sixth Circuit Invalidates Contractual Limitation Periods Under ADA and ADEA

January 21, 2021

On January 15, 2021, the Sixth Circuit held that an employee cannot waive the statutory limitation periods contained in the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") by agreeing to a shorter contractual period of limitations.

In Thompson v. Fresh Products, LLC, et al., the plaintiff sued her former employer asserting various theories of liability, including discrimination under the ADA and the ADEA, as well as claims under Ohio law. The employer countered that plaintiff agreed to a six-month contractual limitations period in the employee handbook acknowledgement, and therefore her claims were untimely. The Sixth Circuit ruled that the contractual limitations period was enforceable with regards to the plaintiff's claims under Ohio law. However, the Court held that "the limitations periods in the ADA and ADEA give rise to substantive, non-waivable rights," and thus could not be modified by contract. The decision comes shortly after the Sixth Circuit invalidated shortened limitation periods for Title VII lawsuits in Logan v. MGM Grand Detroit Casino. It appears that other Federal Courts of Appeals have not yet taken a blanket stance on the enforceability of contractually shortened periods of limitation for these federal acts.

What does this mean for employers?

Employers are encouraged to review their applications, handbooks, and other employment contracts to determine whether they include limitations periods shorter than 180 days (or 300 days in deferral jurisdiction like Michigan) for claims under Title VII, the ADA, or the ADEA, as such contractual limitations will no longer be enforceable with regards to those specific claims, at least in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.

However, contractual limitation periods remain an important and potentially effective means for time-barring state law claims.

As always, please contact the authors or your Miller Canfield attorney if you have any questions.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek